a blog by students in Dr. Talinn Phillips' "Writing About Culture" courses at Ohio University .
Thursday, October 27, 2011
W8: Time for Some Synthesis
For this week's post, begin by choosing either the Myers reading from the coursepack ("The Moral Crusade Against Foodies") or the Fedoroff reading from the day we worked on editorials ("Genetically Engineered Food for All"). Your blog post should be a response to either Myers or Fedoroff and it should utilize the ideas/perspectives of at least two other composers that we've encountered this quarter. Everything is fair game for the other perspectives--films, assigned readings, and readings from the coursepack. You're also welcome to include additional perspectives (i.e. other outside sources) but you need to work with at least 2 people that the whole class has read.
Thursday, October 20, 2011
W7: The Secret Family Recipe
Do you have a secret recipe to share (or just write about)?
Tuesday, October 11, 2011
Food INJustice
Think back through the movie Food, Inc. What did you find most compelling, either in a good way or in a bad way? Use that as a jumping off point to respond to the film.
As an example, to me, all of the sad animal pictures only go so far in persuading me. I'm not an animal person, so that strategy has limited impact on me. (Just to be clear, it's not like I cheer to watch the poor chickens keeling over in the windowless pit of ammonia. But it's not necessarily enough to completely persuade me). What really did piss me off though, was the injustice these companies were perpetrating against "regular people". The old man who was being sued by Monsanto for engaging in completely legal business made me so sad that I was ready to write him a check for his legal bills by the end.
So: what particular aspects of the film were really persuasive to you (or really unpersuasive)?
due October 13 as a comment to this post
As an example, to me, all of the sad animal pictures only go so far in persuading me. I'm not an animal person, so that strategy has limited impact on me. (Just to be clear, it's not like I cheer to watch the poor chickens keeling over in the windowless pit of ammonia. But it's not necessarily enough to completely persuade me). What really did piss me off though, was the injustice these companies were perpetrating against "regular people". The old man who was being sued by Monsanto for engaging in completely legal business made me so sad that I was ready to write him a check for his legal bills by the end.
So: what particular aspects of the film were really persuasive to you (or really unpersuasive)?
due October 13 as a comment to this post
W6: Food Histories
For this week's Personal Blog post, give us a blogged version of your Food Histories presentation. Be sure to hyperlink to your sources and includes graphics as appropriate.
Tuesday, October 4, 2011
W5: Our Fast Food Nation
For this week's post I'm interested in your own "fast food story" but then I really want you to move beyond that and do some thinking about why America is such a fast food nation. I've traveled quite a bit and I know that many of you have too. Nowhere else in the world does fast food like America does fast food. In developing countries, places like McDonald's are luxury items. When you walk inside you'll see a pretty wealthy clientele. In other developed countries (say, in Europe) fast food tends to be relegated to freeway rest stops and a few locations "downtown".
What is it that makes fast food so American? (And, what have you seen fulfilling this role in other countries if you've traveled? How are those foods different from fast foods?)
What is it that makes fast food so American? (And, what have you seen fulfilling this role in other countries if you've traveled? How are those foods different from fast foods?)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)